On 22 June 1633 the scientist Galileo Galilei was found guilty of heresy by the Catholic Church. He was put under house arrest and his offending book Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems was put on the Index of books banned by the church.

Literalist approach

His crime was that he taught that the sun rather than the earth was at the centre of the universe and that while the sun was motionless the earth was not. This was considered heretical because it was clearly counter to the teaching of the Bible in many places. Consider these words from Psalm 96:1 – ‘The LORD reigns, he is robed in majesty; the LORD is robed in majesty and is armed with strength. The world is firmly established; it cannot be moved.’ I’m not sure it’s possible to interpret this verse in any other way than to say it teaches that the earth does not move – if reading it in a literal manner. Or what about this couple of verses in Joshua –
On the day the LORD gave the Amorites over to Israel, Joshua said to the LORD in the presence of Israel: “O sun, stand still over Gibeon, O moon, over the Valley of Aijalon.” So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, till the nation avenged itself on its enemies, as it is written in the Book of Jashar. The sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed going down about a full day. (Joshua 10:12-13.)
Again the meaning is clear – after all, the sun can only stand still if it is considered to be moving in the first place. A literalist understanding of the Bible has to teach a geocentric universe in which the sun revolves around the earth.

Adapting

Yet no one surely believes that this is the case any longer. Nearly 400 years after Galileo’s condemnation and we have accepted that he was correct and that these passages have to be read in a non-literalist way. Science has taught us the truth and theology has had to adapt. Whilst some passages can be regarded as literal truth it must surely be a mistake to say that the whole Bible falls into this category.


Share