Jesus' Jewish Roots
Posted by Dyfed on Monday, October 3, 2011
Under: Mondays with McLaren
In last week’s post I shared McLaren’s suggestion that the Christian story has been hijacked by a philosophy that was essentially pagan and which emphasised the destruction of the body and all material things but the salvation of a disembodied, eternal soul with god.
The Hebraic worldview
Is
there an alternative understanding? Yes, says McLaren, if we read the Bible
from the Hebraic worldview. Our problem is that we have read back to Jesus and
his good news through the lenses provided for us by the Reformers, the medieval
theologians and Greek philosophy. It would be far better if we understood him
by reading forward from Abraham, Moses, and the prophets. After all, Jesus was
a Jew and any true understanding of him must include this Jewish context.
What
do we see if we read Jesus and the good news forwards from the Hebrew Bible?
One key thing to note, suggests McLaren, is that what we have is a story rather
than a set of philosophical beliefs – a story that invites us to participate in
its account. The story begins with a humanity that has room to grow and
develop. Creation is made in such a way that humanity can add to it as they
grow out of the garden they have been placed in. They are mandated to fill the
earth in a creative way that mirrors the image of God that is in them.
Second chances follow each failure
When
things go badly wrong, however, God responds not by destroying all that has
gone bad but by giving them a second chance to fulfil their commission, albeit
having had to face the serious consequences of their fall. But in his mercy he
provides for them clothing that covers their shame and gives them another
opportunity to live out their calling.
This
pattern is repeated many times in the early chapters of Genesis: after every failing
there is a consequence but there is a second chance too. Even when choosing to
flood the earth God still gives humanity the opportunity of a fresh start in
Noah and his family. And it is worth noting that although death is the serious
consequence of having to leave the Garden of Eden, there is nothing in these
early chapters about humanity having to face an eternal punishment for their
sin.
This
cycle of opportunity to participate in God’s story, failure, and second
opportunity, is then broken in Genesis 11 by the introduction of Abram. Through
Abram God calls a people into being – the nation of Israel – in order that his
light and promise could be shared with all nations. One nation would bring
blessing to all. The remainder of Genesis tells the story of how God builds up
this nation-for-nations and brings them to their own land. It ends, however,
with Israel finding itself in the land of Egypt – ultimately as captives.
A meta-narrative in three dimensions
McLaren
sees in Genesis the first of three dimensions of the biblical narrative. If the
first is about setting the scene where God invites and restores humanity to
participate in his plans for creation, then the second, as seen in Exodus, is
about how God liberates humanity when they have been held captive by an
oppressive enemy. God does not abandon humanity to this oppression but rather
intervenes to save and set free.
The
third narrative then moves on to set the scene for a kingdom where there is no
oppression, no death, and no fall. It is a kingdom where the peace of God – shalom – flows like a river and fills
the earth. It is the kingdom spoken of by Isaiah when he sings of the wolf
living with the lamb and the leopard lying down with the goat (Is 11); it is
about a new heaven and a new earth (Is 65). With our Greco-Roman lenses we have
learned to read these promises as something far off in the future, in some
heavenly realm that is beyond history but McLaren suggests that the biblical
narrative invites us to participate with God in the setting up of the kingdom within history here on earth. It provides
us with a vision of hope for the future.
So
let’s allow McLaren to sum up this very different meta-narrative in his own
words:
If
the Genesis story sets the stage by giving us a sacred vision of the past, and
if the Exodus story situates us in the sacred present on a pilgrimage towards
external and internal liberation, then the story of the peace-making kingdom
ignites our faith with a sacred vision of the future, a vision of hope, a
vision of love. It represents a new creation and a new exodus. (Page 85.)
In : Mondays with McLaren
Tags: "brian mclaren" jesus meta-narrative worldview judaism
blog comments powered by Disqus


